Tag: Fred Stewart Portland Oregon

  • The Saga of the 2020 Refinance Fee By Stuart Gaston NMLS 1992605 OR/WA


    When the initial announcement was made on the evening of Aug 12th, the FHFA ‘adverse market’ LLPA refinance fee caused shockwaves in the industry:

    1. Many trade organizations took issue with the fee itself.  The California Association of Realtors felt it was “taking advantage of the current economic crisis” to raise additional revenue. Some have called it a tax 
    2. The relatively short notice was an unforeseen burden on lenders and consumers alike. The Mortgage Bankers Association called it ill-timed and misguided

    Let’s first explore what exactly the fee does and then we’ll review the complex timeframe.

    What is the fee?

    The Loan-Level Price Adjustment (LLPA) is a fancy acronym for a fee applied to conforming loans that meet the funding limits of the FHFA and the guidelines of the GSEs (Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac).  Conforming loans represent the vast majority of mortgages.  The fee has never applied to nonconforming Jumbo loans over $510,400 nor to VA, USDA and FHA loans.

    The -0.50% fee (or 50 bps, pronounced ‘bips’) is for refinances only.   For a $300,000 mortgage that is an extra $1,500.  It’s on top of any “points” someone might be paying at origination. 

    They have clarified that the refi fee does not apply to any mortgage under $125,000 nor certain affordable housing programs like Home Ready.

    The FHFA says the fee is to offset an estimated $6 billion in losses due to forbearance and foreclosure.  With forbearance numbers around 7%, the GSEs will continue buying conforming loans in forbearance through the end of Sept.  To give some perspective, last year that number was around 2%.

    Timing

    The fee would have taken effect on Sep 1st – only about two weeks after announcement.  Record low interest rates were already fueling both a refi bonanza and the purchase market.  Even though lenders prioritize purchase transactions, the ‘pipeline’ of underwriting and funding was getting clogged.  65% of those loans were refinances.  The ubiquitous ’30 day lock’ was being pushed over the limit.  Newly locked loans were at 45 or even 60 days.

    Here’s the rub: the fee was applied to loans already in the funding pipeline as they pass to the GSEs.

    This timing meant that even if a loan was applied for and locked in early July, it would have the fee added as it was delivered to Fannie Mae in September.  The lenders didn’t have any idea in July that this fee was coming and their price sheets were therefore unadjusted.  The banks were caught flat-footed in August and were about to eat a ton of fees come September.

    On the morning of Aug 13th originators were scrambling.  Meetings were postponed and phones were ringing off the hook.  Loan officers were locking loans of most prospects to help them avoid the fee, even those who were on the fence.  Sure enough, within hours lenders across the nation started adding the -0.50% fee to their pricing sheets.  Of course any consumer unfortunate enough to be floating a loan without a lock was now having to deal with the fee at closing.  

    Then what happened?

    The MBA lobbied to have the fee reversed entirely, but on Aug 23rd FHFA acquiesced only partially and the fee was postponed to Dec 1st.  Within days most lenders removed it from their pricing sheets – for a little while.  The -0.50% refinance fee is coming back faster than you think

    That’s because Dec 1st is a sneaky date, and here’s why:

    • It’s still the date for the fee to be applied upon delivery to Fannie and Freddy at the end of the multi-month funding pipelinenot the beginning
    • The lenders are determined not to be caught by surprise once again.  Some lenders are already re-implementing the fee on Sep 15th for the consumer

    An Aug 28th article in Forbes points out that you shouldn’t delay.   In two words: apply immediately

    “Can I refinance after the fee hits?” you ask

    Yes, of course.  Folks with an old mortgage at 3.75% or higher can probably still benefit from a refinance at currently low rates, even with this fee.  Please remember Jumbo loans, loans under $125k, or FHA/VA loans don’t get hit with the fee regardless.  There’s no telling when the fee will go away.  If you were considering a refinance anyway, now is the time to apply and get a lock.  You have only few days left to avoid the fee.The opinions expressed on this article are solely those of its author. Stuart Gaston NMLS 1992605 OR/WA stuart@rootmortgage.com

    Stuart Gaston
    Root Mortgage
    Mortgage Advisor
    NMLS 1992605
    E. stuart@rootmortgage.com  C. 503.913.3285

  • FHA EASES CONDOMINIUM PROJECT APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS: Temporary guidelines will increase number of condominium projects eligible for FHA approval


    WASHINGTON – The Federal Housing Administration (FHA) today published new guidelines under its condominium approval process intended to increase affordable housing options for first-time and low- to moderate-income homebuyers.  Effective immediately, FHA’s temporary guidance will streamline the agency’s condominium recertification process and expand the eligibility of acceptable ‘owner-occupied’ units to include second homes that are not investor-owned.    Read FHA’s mortgagee letter.

    These provisions will expire in one year and serve to revise FHA’s condominium approval process until the agency can implement a more comprehensive condominium rule change.  Today’s guidance:

    1. Modifies the requirements for condominium project recertification;
    2. Revises the calculation of FHA’s required owner-occupancy percentage; and
    3. Expands eligible condominium project insurance coverages.

    Streamline Condominium Recertification

    FHA-approved condominium projects require recertification after two years to ensure that the project is still in compliance with FHA’s eligibility requirements and that no conditions currently exist which would present an unacceptable risk to FHA.  For existing condominium projects seeking recertification, FHA will now only require applicants to submit documents reflecting any substantive changes since the project’s prior approval.

    Calculation of Owner-Occupancy

    The procedure for calculating the required owner-occupancy percentage (50 percent) is modified to allow units that are not investor-owned to be considered owner-occupied for the purpose of Condominium Project approval.  A condominium is considered to be owner-occupied provided they are not:

    • Tenant Occupied;
    • Vacant and listed for rent;
    • Existing (previously occupied), vacant and listed for sale; or
    • Under contract to a purchaser who does not intend to occupy the unit as a Principal Residence or Secondary Residence.  The term Principal Residence and Secondary Residence have the same meaning.

    Expansion of Eligible Condominium Project Insurance Coverage

    Homeowners’ Associations (HOAs) are required to maintain adequate “master” or “blanket” property insurance in an amount equal to 100% of current replacement cost of the condominium (exclusive of land, foundation, excavation and other items normally excluded from coverage). Insurance coverage for condominium project approval that consists of pooled policies for affiliated projects, state-run plans, or contains coinsurance obligations on the part of the policy holder is now permitted to satisfy this requirement.

     

     

    ###

    HUD’s mission is to create strong, sustainable, inclusive communities and quality affordable homes for all.
    More information about HUD and its programs is available on the Internet
    at www.hud.gov and http://espanol.hud.gov.

    You can also connect with HUD on social media and follow Secretary Castro on
    Twitter and Facebook or sign up for news alerts on HUD’s Email List.

     

  • Landlords: Renters That Smoke, by Troy Rappold, Rappold Property Management, LLC


    The ability to smoke in public and at apartment communities has been under attack for years. But what about rental homes? Often times an owner plans to rent their home for only a year or two. Certainly the owner does not want to receive the house back with the smell of cigarette smoke still lingering in the house. Even if the renter was a model tenant in all other respects, cigarette smoke can be very destructive. Smoking turns walls yellow (new paint job $1,200), it destroys carpets ($1,500), and it requires a deeper cleaning, perhaps with a deionizer ($500). The cost of all this stress…priceless.

    The best approach? In all of our homes we have a no smoking policy. However, we do allow the renter to smoke outside, perhaps on the porch or deck. However, this issue can be a hard one to enforce. What if it’s cold outside? Who wants to stand outside when it’s only 35 degrees? The renter is easily tempted to stand inside the house or close to an open window and light up. Inevitably, smoke gets in the house and the home owner smells the evidence. A good suggestion is to do an inspection within the first month or two of a new lease if you know the renter smokes. Catch the problem early. Then do another inspection a few months later to make sure. If you detect smoke after the tenant moves out, a landlord can charge the tenant for the remediation of the smell. But this can be a tricky proposition. It is always best to be pro-active and keep this issue from becoming a possible expense.  It is less ideal to react and pursue a vacating tenant for money.

    You can always call Rappold Property Management with questions about your single family home investment.

    Troy Rappold
    Rappold Property Management, LLC
    1125 SE Madison Street, suite #201
    Portland, OR  97214

    Phone: 503-232-5990
    Fax: 503-232-1462

     

  • 4 Tips On Giving Your Mudroom A Makeover, by Steph Noble, Northwest Mortgage Group


    4_Tips_On_Giving_Your_Mudroom_A_Makeover

    From crunched-up leaves stuck to bottoms of shoes to bulky coats shed as soon as kids walk through the door, mudrooms are ideal for keeping outdoor dirt, wet clothing and outerwear from being strewn throughout your home.

    Mudrooms not only keep the rest of your house clean, but they also designate a spot for those last-minute grabs, such as coats, umbrellas and purses, when you’re running out the door.

    These rooms are great catchalls. However, an organized mudroom can make your life and those hectic mornings much less stressful. Below are smart tips for getting your mudroom ready this fall.

    1. Put In Seating

    After shedding outer layers, the next thing anyone wants to do after coming inside on a cold, wet day is to take off their mucky shoes. So make sure there is a built-in bench or convenient chair for people to sit down and tend to their tootsies. Whether taking off or putting on shoes, it makes life a little more comfortable.

    2. Install A Sink

    A mudroom is supposed to be the catchall for everything dirty from the outdoors. With this in mind, a sink for washing off the grime and mud makes sense. Then you can clean your clothing in the contained space without having to haul them to the kitchen sink or laundry room.

    3. Create Cubbies

    Even though this space is designated as a drop-off point before entering the main living space, you don’t want everything just thrown into one big confusing pile. Create individual cubbies for every person in your household. Each cubby should contain a shelf for purses and backpacks, hooks for coats and a low place for shoes.

    4. Splurge On A Boot Warmer

    While electric boot warmers can be a little expensive, you will definitely think it’s worth the money when it’s freezing outside and your shoes are damp. Electric boot warmers heat your shoes on pegs and dry them out at the same time. They also work well on gloves.

    Fall is a mudroom’s busy season; so get it in shape with the tips above. With all the coats hanging on their hooks, shoes in their cubbies and dirt contained to this designated space, your life will be a little more organized and much less stressful!

     

     

     

    Steph Noble
    Northwest Mortgage Group
    (503) 528-9800
    http://www.stephnoble.com
    http://www.nwmortgagegoup.com

     

     

  • Asking Prices and Inventory for Homes in Portland Oregon June 3rd 2013


    As of June 03 2013 there were about 8,714 single family and condo homes listed for sale in Portland Oregon. The median asking price of these homes was approximately $285,077. Since this time last year, the inventory of homes for sale has decreased by 23.4% and the median price has increased by 10.1%.

    June 03, 2013 Month/Month Year/Year
    Median Asking Price $285,077 +1.8% +10.1%
    Home Listings/Inventory 8,714 +3.5% -23.4%

    Recent Asking Price and Inventory History for Portland

    Date Single Family & Condo
    Inventory
    25th Percentile
    Asking Price
    Median
    Asking Price
    75th Percentile
    Asking Price
    06/03/2013 8,714 $199,000 $285,077 $449,900
    05/27/2013 8,631 $197,700 $285,000 $449,000
    05/20/2013 8,597 $195,000 $282,500 $441,100
    05/13/2013 8,460 $194,950 $280,000 $448,500
    05/06/2013 8,420 $191,900 $279,900 $449,000

    Portland Asking Price History

    The median asking price for homes in Portland peaked in April 2007 at $354,740 and is now $69,663 (19.6%) lower. From a low of $239,125 in February 2011, the median asking price in Portland has increased by $45,952 (19.2%).

    25th, Median (50th) and 75th Percentile Asking Prices for Portland Oregon

    Portland Housing Inventory History

    Housing inventory in Portland, which is typically highest in the spring/summer and lowest in the fall/winter, peaked at 23,354 in July 2008. The lowest housing inventory level seen was 7,969 in March 2013.

    Housing Inventory for Portland Oregon

    Portland Asking Price and Inventory History

    Date Single Family & Condo
    Inventory
    25th Percentile
    Asking Price
    Median
    Asking Price
    75th Percentile
    Asking Price
    June 2013 8,714 $199,000 $285,077 $449,900
    May 2013 8,527 $194,888 $281,850 $446,900
    April 2013 8,075 $186,800 $274,540 $439,060
    March 2013 7,969 $182,923 $267,425 $427,213
    February 2013 7,981 $179,900 $262,450 $419,731
    January 2013 8,250 $179,075 $259,217 $404,725
    December 2012 8,627 $178,900 $259,720 $405,750
    November 2012 9,408 $179,675 $260,950 $408,963
    October 2012 10,259 $179,900 $267,160 $418,600
    September 2012 10,828 $179,900 $268,975 $418,450
    August 2012 11,102 $179,675 $268,725 $418,500
    July 2012 11,140 $177,600 $266,598 $411,651
    June 2012 11,362 $174,825 $259,675 $399,950
    May 2012 11,227 $169,713 $252,463 $399,450
    April 2012 10,820 $169,160 $249,910 $397,940
    March 2012 9,683 $174,450 $259,450 $406,225
    February 2012 10,549 $169,225 $248,250 $388,025
    January 2012 10,833 $169,080 $246,960 $381,960
    December 2011 11,461 $169,925 $248,375 $385,675
    November 2011 12,018 $174,750 $250,972 $397,425
    October 2011 12,846 $179,530 $258,720 $399,900
    September 2011 13,509 $179,939 $259,900 $399,900
    August 2011 14,672 $179,360 $256,590 $395,540
    July 2011 14,772 $178,150 $253,188 $389,225
    June 2011 14,762 $176,475 $250,970 $386,970
    May 2011 14,582 $173,184 $249,160 $375,780
    April 2011 14,748 $169,950 $242,400 $364,975
    March 2011 15,458 $169,800 $239,675 $359,575
    February 2011 15,531 $169,675 $239,125 $354,725
    January 2011 15,001 $170,760 $239,158 $356,380
    December 2010 16,118 $176,200 $242,700 $363,363
    November 2010 17,018 $180,160 $249,330 $373,780
    October 2010 17,614 $184,975 $253,375 $381,975
    September 2010 18,282 $189,100 $258,925 $390,950
    August 2010 18,579 $190,940 $261,150 $397,160
    July 2010 18,160 $195,163 $267,475 $399,000
    June 2010 17,488 $196,853 $268,875 $399,800
    May 2010 17,035 $198,880 $269,620 $399,818
    April 2010 17,279 $198,000 $266,750 $392,500
    March 2010 16,495 $195,600 $264,460 $393,960
    February 2010 15,382 $194,938 $264,450 $395,198
    January 2010 14,895 $197,819 $267,425 $399,225
    December 2009 15,329 $199,897 $272,038 $402,212
    November 2009 15,902 $202,750 $277,760 $417,780
    October 2009 16,573 $209,675 $283,646 $428,225
    September 2009 17,165 $210,000 $289,475 $436,100
    August 2009 17,595 $211,760 $292,880 $444,320
    July 2009 17,819 $212,950 $294,950 $449,000
    June 2009 17,870 $213,460 $294,920 $449,100
    May 2009 17,713 $211,475 $293,291 $445,250
    April 2009 17,978 $212,525 $289,925 $444,725
    March 2009 18,506 $214,153 $289,930 $443,360
    February 2009 18,449 $216,014 $293,968 $448,125
    January 2009 18,872 $219,952 $297,855 $452,809
    December 2008 19,842 $223,220 $302,773 $458,508
    November 2008 20,983 $226,382 $307,532 $464,024
    October 2008 22,086 $229,650 $312,450 $469,724
    September 2008 22,973 $233,730 $319,580 $474,990
    August 2008 23,314 $235,200 $322,000 $475,725
    July 2008 23,354 $236,074 $324,550 $475,000
    June 2008 22,657 $239,150 $324,920 $479,459
    May 2008 21,505 $239,900 $325,000 $480,947
    April 2008 20,669 $239,900 $324,937 $479,912
    March 2008 19,381 $241,300 $324,860 $485,960
    February 2008 18,409 $240,485 $324,925 $479,912
    January 2008 17,659 $243,500 $324,962 $481,765
    December 2007 18,584 $245,120 $327,975 $489,355
    November 2007 19,926 $248,665 $330,475 $486,425
    October 2007 20,762 $249,950 $337,260 $493,980
    September 2007 20,656 $253,425 $339,900 $497,749
    August 2007 19,837 $257,712 $342,975 $499,124
    July 2007 18,710 $261,120 $349,120 $499,930
    June 2007 17,670 $264,282 $349,950 $507,949
    May 2007 16,386 $264,900 $350,975 $512,662
    April 2007 15,059 $264,900 $354,740 $517,740
    March 2007 13,897 $264,450 $353,850 $523,425
    February 2007 13,814 $258,517 $349,800 $516,750
    January 2007 13,726 $255,810 $349,637 $507,441
    December 2006 14,746 $257,149 $348,246 $499,949
    November 2006 15,671 $258,837 $348,750 $499,900
    October 2006 16,027 $259,640 $348,834 $499,900
    September 2006 15,239 $261,098 $349,675 $499,937
    August 2006 14,029 $264,925 $350,737 $518,587
    July 2006 12,864 $264,920 $350,470 $525,980
    June 2006 11,261 $264,925 $349,975 $530,937
    May 2006 9,804 $262,340 $350,940 $532,360
    April 2006 8,701 $256,433 $346,433 $526,224

    Data on deptofnumbers.com is for informational purposes only. No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is offered or implied. Contact ben@deptofnumbers.com (or @deptofnumbers on Twitter) if you have any questions, comments or suggestions.

     

     

     

    Department of Numbers
    http://www.deptofnumbers.com/